Focus and Scope
Edumaspul: Jurnal Pendidikan focuses on the following topics: Curriculum development, teacher education and professional development, teacher training, cross-cultural studies, learning, evaluation, English language teaching, counseling, management, quality of education, and the use of communication and information technology, at various levels of education and how to deliver learning. It provides an academic platform for teachers, lecturers, and researchers to contribute innovative work in the field.
Edumaspul: Jurnal Pendidikan covers all the educational research at the level of primary, secondary, and higher education.
The goal of this journal is to bring together researchers and practitioners from academia and industry to focus on Educational advancements and establishing new collaborations in these areas. Original research papers, state-of-the-art reviews are invited for publication in all areas of Education.
Topics of Interest include, but are not limited to, the following:
|Open Submissions||Indexed||Peer Reviewed|
Peer Review Process
Research articles sent to this online journal will be peer reviewed. Accepted research articles will be available online (free download) following the journal peer-review process. The language used in this Journal is English. Detailed information about reviewing, downloading Reviewer Kits.
Reviewing texts written by fellow scientists is a privilege. However, it is a time-consuming responsibility. Therefore, the Edumaspul Editorial Board, authors, and audiences appreciate your willingness to accept your responsibility and dedication. Edumaspul leads to a fast and fair double-blind peer-review process, and also ensures the quality of articles published. As such, Edumaspul requires reviewers who can provide useful and useful comments about the manuscript sent in about a month. Maintaining Edumaspul as a high-quality scientific journal depends on reviewers with a high level of expertise and the ability to be objective, fair, and broad-minded in evaluating texts.
If Edumaspul's Editor-in-Chief has invited you to review the script, please consider the following:
- Review the text critically, but constructively and prepare detailed comments about the manuscript to help writers improve their work;
- Review various versions of the script as needed;
- Provide all information needed within the specified deadline
- Make recommendations to the editor regarding the suitability of the manuscript for publication in the journal
- Declare to the editor all potential conflicts of interest regarding the author or the contents of the text requested for them to review
- Report possible research errors
- Suggest alternative reviewers if they cannot review the manuscript for any reason
- Treat the manuscript as a confidential document
- Not using the work described in the text
- Don't communicate directly with the author, if they somehow identify the author
- Do not identify themselves to the author
- Do not forward the script assigned to other reviewers
- Ensure that high-quality manuscripts and original works
- Notifying the editor if he finds the manuscript assigned is being considered in another publication to his knowledge
- Writing review reports only in English
- Make comments for publications related to the script reviewed.
The following is a list of items that need to be reviewed:
- Novelty of the topic
- Scientific reliability
- Valuable contribution to the science
- Adding new aspects to the existed field of study
- Ethical aspects
- Structure of the article submitted and its relevance to authors’ guidelines
- References provided to substantiate the content
- Grammar, punctuation, and spelling
Edumaspul Journal reviewing policies are:
- Every submitted paper will be reviewed by at least two peer-reviewers.
- Reviewers are unaware of the identity of the authors, and authors are also unaware of the identity of reviewers (Double-Blind Peer Reviews).
- Reviewing process will consider novelty, objectivity, method, scientific impact, conclusion, and references.
Article evaluation process will be taken approximately two months and the acceptance or rejection decision will be delivered to authors via email and ojs. The articles must not be published elsewhere.
Edumaspul Journal published twice a year on March and October
Open Access Policy
This journal provides immediate OPEN ACCESS to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to full-text articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or author.
This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...
Screening for Plagiarism
The Journal has an authority to screen articles for plagiarism. We use iThenticate and Turnitin to check the authenticity of the article.
Note: Please fill in the publication ethics statement (download) and sent it back to us as an attachment file when article submission process.
The editor is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published.
The editor may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editor may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.
An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.
The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.
Disclosure and conflicts of interest
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.
Duties of Reviewers
Contribution to Editorial Decisions
Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.
Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.
Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.
Standards of Objectivity
Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.
Acknowledgement of Sources
Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.
Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
Duties of Authors
Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.
Originality and Plagiarism
The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.
Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication
An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.
Acknowledgement of Sources
Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.
Authorship of the Paper
Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors.
The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.
Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest
All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.
Fundamental errors in published works
When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.